At the end of last week, Bodega Aurrerá, a Mexican subsidiary of the world's biggest retailer, Wal-Mart, opened a new store in the village of San Juan Teotihuacán, just north of Mexico City. Normally, such an event would cause little stir. Wal-Mart is already Mexico's biggest retailer too. And its shops seem to go down very well with its millions of bargain-hungry customers. But this particular opening was, in fact, the culmination of months of protests, legal actions, hunger strikes and hyperbole by those determined to stop it.

　　The reason is the location. Just 2.5km (1.6 miles) away is the ancient city of Teotihuacán, probably Mexico's most famous archaeological site. Amongst other attractions, it boasts the third-largest (by volume) pyramid in the world. For many Mexicans, the ancient site, abandoned by its mysterious inhabitants centuries before the Spanish conquerors arrived, remains the ultimate symbol of Mexican identity and nationhood. Thousands troop up to the top of the Pyramid of the Sun to celebrate the summer solstice.

　　To them, the idea of having a Wal-Mart next door is abhorrent. In the words of Homero Aridjis, a writer and one of the leading opponents, "it is like driving the stake of globalisation into the heart of old Mexico." The controversy is only the latest in a string of protesters' attempts to save Mexican culture from what they see as a creeping menace. They won a famous victory by blocking a McDonalds restaurant from opening in the main square of the pretty southern colonial town of Oaxaca.

　　But this time they were on much thinner ground. For a start, Wal-Mart went through all the appropriate regulatory hoops, even getting permission from the Paris-based International Council on Monuments and Sites, which judged that the store would cause no harm to the nearby ruins. A small stone platform was indeed found during construction of the new car park, but was preserved.

　　Just as importantly, the claim that the new store spoils the famous view from the top of the Pyramid of the Sun is clearly bogus, as anyone who cares to get to the top can testify. The problem is not so much that you can see the Wal-Mart, but one of trying to distinguish it from the 30-odd other ugly, squat buildings that litter the surrounding countryside--to say nothing of the car parks, the electricity pylons and the large power station. Sadly, unrestricted building long ago ruined this particular view, as well as many others in Mexico.

　　To the diehards, the issue counts more than the view. But neither mattered much to the hundreds of locals who queued up for the opening, delighted to be freed of the small and expensive local shops. Despite a legal case pending against Wal-Mart and local officials, brought by an irate local left-wing politician, this is one battle that the American retailer has probably won.

1. Why the opening of Wal-Mart caused stir?
　　[A]Wal-Mart would have severe competition with the local stores.
　　[B]War-Mart would provide them with a larger choice and more benefits.
　　[C]It was said to have ruined the scene of the ancient site.
　　[D]There shouldn’t be a store near the ancient site.

2. From Paragraph 2 we can infer that _________.
　　[A]the ancient city means a lot to the Mexicans
　　[B]a store will be too noisy for the ancient city
　　[C]the ancient city is very mysterious
　　[D]the pyramid is a good place for holding big ceremony

3. According to Wal-Mart, it has a good reason to build store there because _______.
　　[A]it proves no harm to the nearby ruins
　　[B]the scene of the ancient sites has been damaged
　　[C]customers want to buy some cheap products
　　[D]it has been widely accepted by the customers there.

4. It can be learned from Paragraph 5 that _________.
　　[A]the famous view is not as good as it used to be
　　[B]the city lacks planning in building
　　[C]the ancient site is littered with ugly buildings
　　[D]Wal-Mart shouldn’t be fully responsible for the ruined view.

5. Toward the fate of Wal-Mart, the writer’s attitude can be said to be _________.
　　[A]objective
　　[B]optimistic
　　[C]pessimistic
　　[D]biased

　　答案：CADDB

　　篇章剖析

　　本文采用提出问题——分析问题的模式，指出世界上最大的零售商沃尔玛在墨西哥开设分店时所遇到的麻烦、问题产生的原因以及最终的结果。第一段指出沃尔玛设在墨西哥的子公司Bodega Aurrerá在墨西哥城北部的圣胡安特奥帝瓦坎村开了一家新店所引起的强烈反响；第二段指出事件产生的原因；第三段指出反对者的看法及举动；第四段指出沃尔玛充分的前期工作；第五段指出这座古城的实际情况；第六段指出这个事件最有可能的结果是什么。

　　词汇注释

　　subsidiary[sEb`sIdIErI]n.子公司

　　retailer[5ri:teIlE(r)]n.零售商人, 传播的人

　　go down with vt.为...所接受,为...相信

　　culmination[kQlmI5neIF(E)n]n.顶点;结果

　　hyperbole[haI5p\:bElI]n.[修辞]夸张法

　　summer solstice夏至

　　creeping[`kri:pIN]adj.爬行的；在一段时间内逐步发展的：

　　bogus[5bEJ^Es]adj.<美>假的, 伪造的

　　diehard[5daIhB:d]n.顽固分子

　　irate[aI5reIt]adj发怒的；生气的

　　难句突破

　　1.But this particular opening was, in fact, the culmination of months of protests, legal actions, hunger strikes and hyperbole by those determined to stop it.

　　主体句式：the … opening was … the culmination …

　　结构分析：本句是一个简单句。“months of protests, legal actions, hunger strikes and hyperbole”跟在介词“of”后面来修饰“culmination”；“by”意思是“由…”；“determined”之前省去了“who are”。

　　句子译文：这次开张实际上是那些决心阻止它成立的人数月以来进行反对、合法行动、绝食抗议和其它一些偏激行为无效而落得的最终结果

　　2.For many Mexicans, the ancient site, abandoned by its mysterious inhabitants centuries before the Spanish conquerors arrived, remains the ultimate symbol of Mexican identity and nationhood.

　　主体句式：the ancient site …remains …the symbol

　　结构分析：本句是一个简单句。“abandoned”之前省去了“which was”。

　　句子译文：数百年前在西班牙征服者到来之前被这里的神秘居民所抛弃的这座古城，对很多墨西哥人来说依然是墨西哥民族和国家身份的根本象征。

　　题目分析

　　1.答案为C, 属推理判断题。从句子“Normally, such an event would cause little stir.”，我们可以看出沃儿玛开业这样的事情一般不会引起什么反响的。但是作者笔锋一转，“But this particular opening was, in fact, the culmination of months of protests, legal actions, hunger strikes and hyperbole by those determined to stop it.”那么为什么反对在沃儿玛开业，原因在于“The reason is the location.”和“the claim that the new store spoils the famous view from the top of the Pyramid of the Sun”。

　　2.答案为A，属推理判断题。原文对应信息是“For many Mexicans, the ancient site, abandoned by its mysterious inhab